LinkedIn sluggification of URLs has some interesting side effects. An LinkedIn News article about the $6.3B crypto heist at Binance resulted the slug binance-hit-by-record-shattering-63b-crypto-heist-7744324 which reads like a $63B heist, not $6.3B.
Big numbers either way, but an order of magnitude difference is pretty significant, er, slugdifferent... '.' does not have to be changed; i.e. binance-hit-by-record-shattering-6.3b-crypto-heist-7744324 would be fine.
https://www.linkedin.com/news/story/binance-hit-by-record-shattering-63b-crypto-heist-7744324/
