In the ballot, one Sullivan is clearly identified as Republican and the incumbent. How is this confusing when the two are clearly delineated on the ballot itself?
This is implausible.
So, (a) no proof of injury = no standing; (b) no power to intervene by Constitution; (c) does not even clear the bar on the major questions doctrine; (d) relies entirely on an expansive interpretation of statutes.
What this DoJ is betting on, is conservative SCOTUS playing Calvinball on its prior "principles".
