That said: in that list the best RATs were only reliable for high viral loads... if someone's viral load was medium to low they were less reliable... IIRC the best RATs had a sensitivity of a bit over 50% across ALL viral loads.
Here's the XLS of the sensitivity of various RATs from the PEI (data is old): https://www.pei.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/newsroom/dossiers/archivversion-vergleichende-evaluierung-sensitivitaet-sars-cov-2-antigen-schnelltests-30-05-2022-xls.xlsx?__blob=publicationFile&v=6
edit to add: the medomics brand back then had a sensitivity of 42% across all viral loads and that's just for SARS... not for flu, metapneumovirus or RSV.